Once Again, It’s Hofstra Time . . . Unfortunately

December 6, 2012

 

 

December 7, 2012

 

Each of the last eight years, I have had the pleasure and good fortune to attend and write about the men’s basketball team of Hofstra.  I have also claimed that attending these games at Mack Arena is the best sports buy in the metropolitan area.  But this one’s different, and it wasn’t an easy one to write.

 

Two weeks ago, the Hofstra community and part of the basketball world were rocked with the revelation that four Hofstra men’s basketball student-athletes (S-A) were involved (allegedly?) with stealing electronic equipment, including laptops, cell phones, iPods, etc.

 

My take follows.

 

I’m in the process of writing a book on college basketball.  In the last chapter, which is concerned with the future of the game, I predict another major scandal involving shaving points and fixing the outcome of games.  Why?  Because the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has put in place one of the all-time great scams on the public.  The S-As provide the entertainment that generates billions of dollars for the NCAA, and yet, they never see a piece of this monstrous, gigantic financial pie.  T-shirts and sweatshirts are marketed with their names and numbers on them, and yet, the NCAA makes certain they don’t get any royalties.

 

The NCAA has perpetrated this fantasy myth of a S-A that includes the requirement that the S-A live a life of poverty during their scholarship years.  Many of the S-As playing basketball (as well as football) in the major schools are not only poor but also anything but students.  Hell, some of them can’t even spell “student” after graduation.  For example, some time back, one S-A spelled student “stutan”; another worded the answer “yes’ on his application to the question on “sex.”  All of the above is compounded by the fact that they come from low-income families – in effect, they’re broke; which is why 3 of the 4 were not able to post a measly bail.

 

 

So back to the Hofstra players.   We are all a product of our society and environment.   These four certainly didn’t know the difference between right and wrong.  Who’s to blame?  Their parents?  Their church?  Their school?  The NCAA?  No doubt, a combination of all four.  And, no doubt, they will be made an example by District Attorney Rice and some school administrators, with all but the four kids essentially being absolved on any wrongdoings.

 

I am ashamed to admit that a well-to-do close friend of mine occasionally steals money from someone dear to him who is rich beyond words.  When I prod him on what his God would think and/or how he handles confessions, his response is that the person could definitely afford it and would not miss it.  How’s that for logic from a college-educated adult?  Can one draw an analogy between my friend and these four?  And how about the white-collar crimes committed on a daily basis on Wall Street, business,
and government?  And what about those who cheat on their income taxes? I kept this in mind when thinking of these four, realizing that although their crime was more personal in nature, none of the others described above would be punished, or even reprimanded.

 

It is also important to note that these kids did not commit a violent crime.  No rape.  No muggings.  No beatings.  No murder.  Should they be penalized?  Of course, but we should keep in mind that there are rapists and murderers walking around scot-free.  I do hope the four are penalized, but I also hope they will be given a second chance.  That is something we all deserve for our indiscretions, particularly those of a first-time nature.

 

I was asked how do I really feel.  There was essentially no surprise, but there was disappointment and sadness.  Sadness more than disappointment.  Sadness because of the impact the conduct of these four young men will have on not only those who love them, but also their coaches, teammates, friends and classmates, as well as all the legitimate S-As who do the right thing.  I also feel for these four youngsters (three are 18 years old) and hope they realize that their world has not come to an end; they still have a lifetime to live.

 

Here are comments from two colleagues/friends:

Jack Powers,former Executive Director of the National Invitational Tournament (NIT), picks it up from there.  “You have to feel sorry for everyone involved.  This was different from some of the recent battery and rape cases involving some basketball programs.  What they did was wrong but no one should jump to conclusions regarding punishment.  I would need to know more about each kid.  Perhaps a year’s suspension would be appropriate.  But they shouldn’t totally shut the door on some of these kids.  We all did crazy things when we were young.  I’m reminded of the saying ‘people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.’”

Dr. John Wilcox, former Director of the Center for Professional Ethics and my ethics book coauthor, continues the outside narrative.  “It’s important to understand that these four are not hardened criminals.  Putting them in jail really won’t serve any useful purpose.  Some form of rehabilitation is in order and one can only hope that they will become a useful and integral part of society.”

 

In the final analysis, it’s safe to say that this is a sad commentary for the four boys, their families, and the NCAA.  One can only hope that this will play out in a fair, just and compassionate manner, and others will learn from what occurred at Hofstra.

 

Visit the author at http://www.theodorenewsletter.com


Once Again, It’s Hofstra Time

December 6, 2012

November 23, 2012

It is mid-November.  That can only mean one thing:  it’s time for Hofstra’s men’s basketball.

Athletic Director Jack Hayes told me that this is supposed to be a rebuilding year for Hofstra.  Gone is their once-in-a-lifetime superstar Charles Jenkins.  I can still hear the student body’s haunting chant of “Char – les Jen – kins.”  The relentless passage of time has unfortunately altered Hofstra’s comfort zone.  Everybody thrilled to Charles’ last-minute heroics as he, time and time again, extricated the team from certain defeat.

But he is now gone.  Well, not really, He was in attendance at the season opener this past Friday.  (The NBA is still in lockout mode at the time of the submission of this article.)  He signed autographs, including one on our grandson’s #22 jersey—the number was retired at the end of last season.  I commented at the press conference that senior guard Michael Moore was the heir apparent.  Me and my big mouth.  I was effectively told:  there is no heir to Charles.

Back to the present team.  It may indeed be a rebuilding year.  But Moore—a terrific player is his own right—and Nathaniel Lester—an excellent underrated small forward—are back.  The big question is whether they can make up for the team’s lack of height.

Prior to last Friday’s home opener, Coach Mo Cassera told me they were undefeated.  Well, Hofstra beat Long IslandUniversity (who made the NCAA playoffs last season) by 20 points after leading by 30 points late in the game.  So Mo, you’re still undefeated.

Mike and Nat?  They scored 23 and 33 points, respectively.  The Team?  They played great, with a level of intensity I haven’t seen in a while.

The team is off to a good start with a 1-0 record at this time.  Their next game is this Saturday afternoon at 4:00 P.M. Folks do yourselves a favor and attend one of their games. The enthusiastic support of the Hofstra student body at the games is contagious. For me, attending Hofstra games still remains the best sports buy in the New York Metropolitan area; it’s even cheaper than going to the movies.  There is ample free parking, easy access in and out of the Sports Complex, the concession stands are not a rip-off ($3.25 for a dog, $1.40 for a soda, etc.), and there isn’t a bad seat in the house.  Did I mention that its $5 for seniors and children, and the whole exciting atmosphere is conducive to family attendance?  I don’t think this is an exaggeration, but every home game last year turned out to be a thriller.  It was raw excitement.  Share it with someone you care about.  I guarantee you won’t regret it.


The King is Dead–Long Live the King

December 28, 2011

            Three years ago about this time I came to the realization that there was a special basketball player at Hofstra.  His name?  Charles Jenkins.  It was then, as a sophomore, that I started touting him as potential NBA material.  Here are some earlier clips from past articles I wrote about him while he played for Hofstra.

December 19, 2008:

“Two years ago several NBA scouts converged on the Mack Sports Arena, home of the Pride, Hofstra’s basketball team.  The drawing card was Loren Stokes, Hofstra’s All-Conference guard.  The scouts reappeared last year to see Antoine Agudio in action.  Both are currently playing professionally inEuropeand looking forward to another NBA . . . The scouts will not be back again this year.  But they will be back two years from now.  Why?  To give a careful look at Charles Jenkins, Hofstra’s 2007-8 Freshman Conference Rookie of the Year.”

November 27, 2009:

“Does Jenkins have a shot to make it in the NBA?  He might.  His performance this year and next year will no doubt determine his future.  He’s 6’3” with excellent speed and the body of a linebacker, a tenacious defensive player, an excellent rebounder but only (at this time) a fair shooter…all the minimum credentials required to make it at the next level.  But, what has impressed me more is his “learning “ curve which I would dub as exponential…he was good as a freshman, great last year, but looks absolutely super this year.  There’s still room for improvement since it appears that Jenkins has yet to peak.”

December 22, 2010:

“I think he has a better than 50-50 chance of making the NBA.  He’s built like an oversized fullback, a fearsome driver, an excellent shot, and solid defensively; actually, a sight to behold.”

February 11, 2011:

“But I have a guy who in my judgment is more deserving of this (Player of the Year) award.  My selection?  Hofstra’s 6’3” guard–Charles Jenkins, who I also refer to as Sir Charles.  Before you call me crazy, hear me out . . . For starters, the criteria for selection requires that the candidate be a full-time student with a passing GPA, has made outstanding contributions to team play, and be a model citizen both on and off the court. Despite every opponent keying defensively on Charles, he is currently averaging 24 points per game (4th in the nation) with 19 in the second half, 4.3 assists, and 4.6 rebounds, 2.3 steals, 50% on 3-point field goals, 60.3% on field goals, 2.3 steals and an assist turnover ratio of 1.8:1.  But all the others under consideration have equally impressive statistics.  Here are a host of intangible factors one will not find with the others.

  1. A versatile player, he has played the role of a 1 guard, a 2 guard, and a small forward.
  2. He appears to enjoy assists more than scoring.
  3. Unlike the scam perpetrated by the NCAA with some of the stars, Charles is a legitimate student-athlete.
  4. Perhaps most importantly, he has made his teammates better.
  5. Finally, he has single-handedly converted the team into not only a winner but also one that can compete with most NCAA teams.

The bottom line is that Charles is the quintessential team player who is not solely interested in scoring.  Twice at the end of a game that Hofstra had already won, Charles was in a breakaway situation and chose not to take the easy lay-up.

November 18, 2011:

Gone is their once-in-a-lifetime superstar Charles Jenkins.  I can still hear the student body’s haunting chant of “Char – les Jen – kins.”  The relentless passage of time has unfortunately altered Hofstra’s comfort zone.  Everybody thrilled to Charles’ last-minute heroics as he, time and time again, extricated the team from certain defeat.

December 18, 2011: 

            Here’s the latest on Charles.  He just signed a $550,000 first year contract with the Warriors, with an option of $650,000 for the following year.  The Warriors brass have indicated that he will initially serve as a backup guard but feel that he has the potential of becoming a premier guard.  But, as far as Hofstra is concerned, the King is dead.

            Long live the King.  Well, maybe.  I commented at an early press conference, that Michael Moore might be the heir apparent. And, he might be.  A transfer from Fordham, his high school and college statistics are as good if not better than those of Charles.  There has also been a significant uptick in performance from last year.  And, from a former scout’s perspective, ability is important, but it is improvement over time that trumps all other factors.

            IsMooregood enough to make the NBA?  I think he has a reasonable chance of being selected late in the second round.  He is very athletic with a wiry 6’5” frame (he looks taller to me), an ideal physique for an NBA player.  He is an exceptional shooter with excellent speed, solid defensively, and superb floor savvy.  On the negative side, he has yet to demonstrate the same intensity as Charles, and they will be keying on him in Conference play.  It’s also a rebuilding year for a team that has demonstrated surprising ability on occasions, but their shooting has been sporadic, have appeared confused against zone defenses, and one can only hope that the big men will develop as the season goes on.

Visit the author at:  www.theodorenewsletter.com


Once Again, It’s Hofstra Time

December 28, 2011

It is mid-November.  That can only mean one thing:  it’s time for Hofstra’s men’s basketball.

            Athletic Director Jack Hayes told me that this is supposed to be a rebuilding year for Hofstra.  Gone is their once-in-a-lifetime superstar Charles Jenkins.  I can still hear the student body’s haunting chant of “Char – les Jen – kins.”  The relentless passage of time has unfortunately altered Hofstra’s comfort zone.  Everybody thrilled to Charles’ last-minute heroics as he, time and time again, extricated the team from certain defeat.

            But he is now gone.  Well, not really, He was in attendance at the season opener this past Friday.  (The NBA is still in lockout mode at the time of the submission of this article.)  He signed autographs, including one on our grandson’s #22 jersey—the number was retired at the end of last season.  I commented at the press conference that senior guard Michael Moore was the heir apparent.  Me and my big mouth.  I was effectively told:  there is no heir to Charles.

            Back to the present team.  It may indeed be a rebuilding year.  But Moore—a terrific player is his own right—and Nathaniel Lester—an excellent underrated small forward—are back.  The big question is whether they can make up for the team’s lack of height.

            Prior to last Friday’s home opener, Coach Mo Cassera told me they were undefeated.  Well, Hofstra beatLong IslandUniversity(who made the NCAA playoffs last season) by 20 points after leading by 30 points late in the game.  So Mo, you’re still undefeated.

            Mike and Nat?  They scored 23 and 33 points, respectively.  The Team?  They played great, with a level of intensity I haven’t seen in a while.

            The team is off to a good start with a 1-0 record at this time.  Their next game is this Saturday afternoon at 4:00 P.M. Folks do yourselves a favor and attend one of their games. The enthusiastic support of the Hofstra student body at the games is contagious. For me, attending Hofstra games still remains the best sports buy in the New York Metropolitan area; it’s even cheaper than going to the movies.  There is ample free parking, easy access in and out of the Sports Complex, the concession stands are not a rip-off ($3.25 for a dog, $1.40 for a soda, etc.), and there isn’t a bad seat in the house.  Did I mention that its $5 for seniors and children, and the whole exciting atmosphere is conducive to family attendance?  I don’t think this is an exaggeration, but every home game last year turned out to be a thriller.  It was raw excitement.  Share it with someone you care about.  I guarantee you won’t regret it.